Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: Relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement
Ahmad Asakereh and Maliheh Dehghannezhad
Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran
This study investigated the relationship between student satisfaction with speaking classes, speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, and speaking skills achievement. To this end, one hundred Iranian EFL undergraduate students filled out two questionnaires; a research-made and pilot-tested questionnaire for student satisfaction with speaking classes, and a questionnaire for speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, adapted from Rahimi and Abedini (2009), Gahungu (2007), Wang et al. (2013), and Saeidi and Ebrahimi Farshchi (2012). Participants' final scores in speaking skills were collected from their instructors and regarded as a measure of their speaking skills achievement. The results of Pearson correlation analyses showed that both student satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs had significant positive correlations with speaking skills achievement, with the latter being stronger. Moreover, the results of Pearson correlation analyses also indicated the existence of a significant positive correlation between student satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs. Multiple regression analyses showed that between the independent variables of the study, speaking self-efficacy beliefs was a significantly stronger predicator of Iranian EFL students' speaking skills achievement.
Available literature indicates a correlation of speaking skills with a number of factors for which comprehensive investigation can provide a better picture of this language skill and may make a significant contribution to teaching and learning in this complex area. However, the literature on the relationship between affective variables and speaking skills reveals the scarcity of research on the correlation between speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, student satisfaction with English speaking classes, and speaking skills achievement. Therefore, this study seeks to bring these affective variables together, and determine the extent to which such variables contribute to EFL students' speaking skills achievement.
Self-efficacy was derived from Bandura's social-cognitive theory and suggests that individuals' beliefs about their abilities significantly influence their subsequent achievement. It has been examined in various disciplines and settings and has received support from a growing body of findings in various fields. In past decades, self-efficacy has been studied extensively in educational research, primarily in the area of academic performance, motivation, and self-regulation (Bandura, 1986; Graham & Weiner, 1996; Lent et al., 1987; Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002; Mills, 2004; Pintrich & Schunk, 1996; Schunk, 1991). In EFL contexts, self-efficacy studies pivot around a number of variables, namely language learning strategies, language anxiety, motivation, and language achievement.
Numerous studies have shown that high levels of self-efficacy are associated with good performance in language learning tasks in different language domains (Rahimi & Abedini, 2009; Farjami & Amerian, 2013; Ghonsooly & Elahi, 2010; Hsieh & Schallert, 2008; Liu, 2013; Mills, Pajares & Herron, 2006, 2007; Wang, Kim, Bong & Ahan, 2009). Considering the issue that students with higher degrees of self-efficacy exert greater effort in order to perform the required tasks (Pajares, 2000), many researchers have conducted studies in EFL contexts to determine its possible correlation with students' learning achievement. Ghonsooly, Elahi and Golparvar (2012), for instance, examined the relationship between university students' self-efficacy and their achievement in general English. The results showed a significant positive relationship between university students' self-efficacy and their achievement in general English. Similar results were also reported in other studies, which emphasised self-efficacy as a strong predictor of academic achievement (Doordinejad & Afshar, 2014; Hsieh & Schallert, 2008; Rahemi, 2007; Rahimpour & Nariman-Jahan, 2010; Wigfield, 1994; Zimmerman, Bandura & Martinez-Pon, 1992).
A number of other studies also investigated relationships between EFL learners' self-efficacy and their language skills achievement. Some studies (Kargar & Zamanian, 2014; Naseri & Zaferanieh, 2012; Shang, 2011) revealed a positive relationship between self efficacy beliefs and reading comprehension skills achievement. However, unlike the previous studies, Asadi Piran (2014) examined the relationships between self-efficacy, self-esteem, self-concept and reading comprehension achievement of 92 EFL learners and found no significant relationship between self-efficacy and reading comprehension score.
The relationship between self-efficacy and EFL listening achievement was investigated by Chen (2007). The results indicated a significant positive relationship between EFL learners' self-efficacy beliefs and their listening achievement. In line with the results obtained by Chen (2007), Rahimi and Abedini's (2009) findings revealed that listening comprehension self-efficacy was significantly correlated with listening proficiency. Several researchers in the field have also taken writing self-efficacy into consideration. Hosseini Fatemi and Vahidnia (2013), for example, found a significant relationship between learners' writing performance and their English self-efficacy beliefs.
However, it seems little research has been conducted on the relationship between speaking skills achievement and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs. One of the few studies conducted on speaking self-efficacy is a recent study by Liu (2013), who investigated the effects of a campus "English Bar" on college students' speaking self-efficacy. Using a questionnaire and in-depth interviews, it was revealed that students who often speak English at the "Bar", showed a considerably higher level of self-efficacy compared to their peers who seldom or never visited the "Bar". The positive effects of frequenting the "Bar" were described by Liu as follows: first, students were free to choose the partners as well as the topics to reduce their anxiety. Second, students with poor speaking skills were encouraged by the foreign teachers and their partners. Third, students' self-confidence and self-efficacy was increased as they observed "similar others" who were fluent English speakers. Finally, students were motivated and worked harder as they realised that they were making progress in their use of English for self expression.
Those who are satisfied with their language learning progress are likely to be those who are able to successfully create and maintain a supportive social learning space for their language learning efforts. (p. 150).Jannati and Marzban (2015) conducted a study to investigate EFL learners' perception of learning environment and its possible relationship with their language achievement. A total of 100 intermediate EFL learners participated in the study using the "What is happening in this class" (WIHIC) questionnaire (Fraser, 1998) and a shortened version of a paper-based TOEFL was used to measure the participants' English proficiency level. The results indicated a large difference between the learners' actual learning environment and the environment in which they were willing to learn the language. According to the researchers, the reason for the students' dissatisfaction was the classroom environment not being personalised or/and conceptualised for both EFL teachers and students in the educational context of Iran.
Moreover, the results of the study revealed that there was a significant relationship between their satisfaction with the classroom environment and their language achievement. Similar results have been reported by other researchers (Efe, 2009; Fraser, 1994; Heikkilä & Lonka, 2006; Schaal, 2010; Waldrip & Fisher, 2003), who found that student performances were significantly affected by their satisfaction.
In summary, the literature indicates students' satisfaction with classroom environment and their self-efficacy are significantly related to their academic performance. However, the relationship between the above-mentioned variables and speaking skills achievement has remained unclear and requires further research.
To develop the satisfaction with speaking classes questionnaire the following steps were taken:
|Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin||Measure of sampling adequacy||0.74|
|Bartlett's Test of Sphericity||Approx. chi-square||1.87|
A proficiency test (Oxford Proficiency Test) was also employed to determine the participants' language proficiency level.
Although the instructions were clearly stated in each questionnaire, questions related to the items of the questionnaires were answered and information on how to complete the questionnaires was further explained to the participants. No time limit was specified, though most respondents required about 20 minutes. After receiving each participant's consent, their final scores in speaking skills were requested and collected from their instructors. These scores provided the measure of their speaking skills achievement.
Table 2 indicates that there was a positive correlation between participants' satisfaction with speaking classes and their speaking skills achievement, r = .459, N = 100, p < .05.
To answer the second research question, a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was run, with results summarised in Table 3.
Table 3 shows that there was a positive correlation between participants' speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs and their speaking skills achievement, r = .560, N = 100, p < .05.
The third research question set out to investigate the probable relationship between Iranian EFL students' satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs. To answer the third research question, a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was run, with results summarised in Table 4.
Table 4 demonstrates that there was a positive significant correlation between participants' satisfaction with speaking classes and their speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, r = .625, N = 100, p < .05.
The fourth research question sought to investigate satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, which one is a significantly stronger predictor of Iranian EFL students' speaking skills achievement. To this end, a multiple-regression analysis was run, the results of which are presented in Tables 5, 6 and 7.
Table 5 shows multiple correlation coefficients as well as the adjusted and unadjusted correlation of satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, with speaking skills achievement.
|Std. error of|
Given Table 5, the multiple correlation coefficient (R), using the two predictors (i.e. satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs) simultaneously, is 0.58 (R2 = 0.33) and the adjusted R2 is 0.31. It indicates that 31% of the variance in learners' speaking skills achievement can be predicted from the combination of the above-mentioned predictors.
ANOVA was run to see whether the combination of the predictors (i.e. satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs) significantly predicted Iranian EFL learners' speaking skills achievement (Table 6).
|Model||Sum of squares||df||Mean square||F||Sig|
Regarding Table 6, the combination of satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs predicated speaking skills achievement of the participants, F (2, 96) = 20.74, p = .000 < .05.
The amount of the contribution of each of the two independent variables (satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs) to the dependent one (speaking skills achievement) is summarised in Table 7.
Concerning Table 7, satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, the latter was a stronger predictor of speaking skills achievement of the participants, (beta = .44, t = 3.9, p = .000 < .05).
As the results have shown, students expressing high satisfaction with speaking classes received high scores in speaking skills, and those expressing low satisfaction received low scores. Although little research has been conducted to investigate the relationship between EFL students' satisfaction with speaking classes and their speaking skills achievement, a number of studies (e.g. Efe, 2009; Fraser, 1994; Heikkilä & Lonka, 2006; Schaal, 2010; Waldrip & Fisher, 2003) investigated the relationship between student satisfaction and their academic performance, with results in accord with the findings of the present study. As stated by Rashidi & Moghadam (2014), student satisfaction with their learning environment can contribute to their willingness to continue their learning process; in that students feel their expectations are met. On the other hand, when students find the learning environment unsatisfactory, they may be discouraged and lose their motivation to continue learning. Thus a satisfactory classroom environment can encourage students to develop a good command of speaking skills.
A number of factors can affect students' satisfaction with their speaking classes, including educational system and facility-related, instructor-related, socially-related, psychologically-related, and linguistically-related factors. Therefore, speaking instructors and administrators should take these factors into account and attempt to meet students' needs in order to create a satisfactory speaking classroom for EFL students. However, it is not an easy task for EFL instructors and administrators to consider every factor which can affect EFL student satisfaction. Training competent speaking teachers who can create a satisfactory speaking classroom environment may be part of the solution. Administrators and education policy-makers need to exert more emphasis on student satisfaction with facilities and education system, by investigating and addressing EFL students' needs.
Results of this study show that students with higher speaking skills self-efficacy are more likely to receive higher scores in speaking skills. Bandura (1986) stated that it can be due to the fact that self-belief in general can help students to participate in tasks, and students with high self-efficacy set higher goals and engage themselves in tasks which require considerable effort, persistence, and interest (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2003; Pajares, 1996, 2003). Moreover, self-efficacy beliefs determine the amount of effort, perseverance and resilience individuals spend on an activity, and self efficacy-beliefs can affect an individual's thought patterns and emotional reactions. With the aforementioned facilitative effects of self-efficacy beliefs in mind, high speaking self-efficacy beliefs can contribute to students' speaking skills achievement as those with high self-efficacy enjoy high self-confidence and are encouraged to carry out speaking tasks with different difficulty levels. Students with a high sense of self-efficacy have confidence to approach difficult tasks, while those with low self-efficacy might think things are tougher than they really are, which can lead to a sense of stress and depression (Pajares, 1996).
Bandura (1997) proposed four sources from which self-efficacy beliefs are developed: mastery experience, vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological states. The first source, mastery experience, suggests that past experiences play a significant role in developing self-efficacy beliefs. People who have accomplished a task successfully tend to have higher sense of self-efficacy. Thus, in order to improve students' speaking skills self efficacy beliefs, in the beginning, speaking instructors need to provide students with speaking tasks which are not arduous and do not require considerable effort, thereby increasing the likelihood of their success in performing the task. This can have a facilitative effect, improving their speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs.
Secondly, vicarious experience is received when learners observe the performances of their peers and friends. This enables them to appraise their own capabilities in relation to the attainments of others. Observing friends and peers performing a task successfully can develop positive feelings about their own capabilities, which in turn results in a higher sense of self-efficacy. Therefore, helping students to be attentive in speaking classes and encouraging them to monitor the speaking tasks performed by their classmates can boost their speaking skills self-efficacy.
Social persuasion, received from others, is the third source of influence, which pivots around initiating a task, trying hard to succeed, and employing new strategies (Pajares, 2002). Positive persuasion suggests that success is achievable, while negative persuasion impinges upon self-beliefs (Vaezi & Fallah, 2011). In EFL language classrooms, the teacher's feedback and evaluation can take the form of either positive or negative persuasion. Thus, speaking instructors should attempt to persuade students by providing them with facilitative feedback which results in the improvement of their speaking skills self-efficacy.
Lastly, psychological and affective states, namely stress, fear reactions, anxiety, fatigue and excitement can affect self-efficacy. For instance, learners with low levels of stress and anxiety tend to perform task more successfully. Therefore, transforming debilitative states to facilitative states is one of the key factors in improving perceived self-efficacy beliefs (Bandura, 1997). As students in speaking classes may encounter many negative affective factors such as stress, anxiety, shyness and so on, speaking instructors should create a congenial atmosphere for students; so that students can boost their self-efficacy beliefs.
The present study is also an examination of the relationship between Iranian EFL students' satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs. The results reveal a significant positive relationship between the above-mentioned variables. Apparently, no study in the field has examined the relationship between these variables; therefore, further research is required to shed light on the relationship between these two variables.
The fourth research question sought to investigate satisfaction with speaking classes and speaking skills self efficacy, which one is a stronger predictor of Iranian EFL students' speaking skills achievement. The results demonstrate that Iranian EFL students' speaking skills self-efficacy is a stronger predictor of their speaking skills achievement. The findings emphasised the significance of students' beliefs in their ability in general, and in their speaking skills in particular.
The findings of the present study suggest that EFL instructors and administrators need to provide students with satisfactory learning environments in order to better contribute to students' speaking skills achievement. EFL instructors also need to assist students to nurture their speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, in order to help them deal with exacting speaking tasks in both real life and classroom contexts. Furthermore, the findings can also raise EFL language learners' awareness of the importance of speaking skills self-efficacy beliefs, and encourage them to seek opportunities to improve their self-efficacy beliefs.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review, 84(2), 191-215. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, H. Y. (2007). The relationship between EFL learners' self-efficacy beliefs and English performance. PhD thesis, Florida State University http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/3846/
Demaris, M. C. & Kritsonis, W. A. (2008). The classroom: Exploring its effects on student persistence and satisfaction. Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools, 2(1), 1-9. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501268.pdf
Doordinejad, F. G. & Afshar, H. (2014). On the relationship between self-efficacy and English achievement among Iranian third grade high school students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 461-470. http://www.ijllalw.org/finalversion6437.pdf
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Efe, R. (2009). Science student teachers attitudes towards reflective practice: Differences in subjects and grades. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 72-86. http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/cjes/article/view/107/40
Farjami, H. & Amerian, M. (2013). Relationship between EFL learners' perceived social self-efficacy and their foreign language classroom anxiety. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 4(10), 77-103. http://www.magiran.com/view.asp?Type=pdf&ID=1117327&l=en
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1009932514731
Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environment: An international perspective (pp. 1-25). Singapore: World Scientific.
Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gahungu, O. N., (2007). The relationships among strategy use, self efficacy, and language ability in language ability in foreign language learners. EdD dissertation. Northern Arizona University. https://nau.edu/COE/Curriculum-Instruction/_Admin/_Forms/Gahungu_Dissertation_PDF/
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ghonsooly, B. & Elahi, M. (2010). Learners' self-efficacy in reading and its relation to foreign language reading anxiety and reading achievement. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(127), 45-67. http://profdoc.um.ac.ir/articles/a/1020898.pdf
Ghonsooly, B., Elahi, M. & Golparvar, S. E. (2012). General English university students' self-efficacy and their achievement. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(3), 153-173. http://iranian-efl-journal.com/256/2012/2014/01/general-english-university-students-self-efficacy-and-their-achievement/
Graham, S. & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Heikkilä, A. & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students' approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070500392433
Hosseini Fatemi, A. & Vahidnia, F. (2013). An investigation into Iranian EFL learners' level of writing self-efficacy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1698-1704. http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/09/28.pdf
Hsieh, P. P. & Schallert, D. L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates' motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 513-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.01.003
Jannati, M. & Marzban, A. (2015). Iranian EFL learners' perception of learning environment in English language institutes and its relationship with learners' English proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(3), 23-38. http://www.jallr.ir/index.php/JALLR/article/view/39/pdf_37
Kargar, M. & Zamanian, M. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy and reading comprehension strategies used by Iranian male and female EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(2), 313-325. http://www.ijllalw.org/finalversion7223.pdf
Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214287
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 265-269. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0188.8.131.525
Li, Y. & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144-162. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/June-2010.pdf
Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327. http://www.nasponline.org/publications/periodicals/spr/volume-31/volume-31-issue-3/motivation-as-an-enabler-for-academic-success
Liu, M. (2013). English Bar as a venue to boost students' speaking self-efficacy at the tertiary level. English Language Teaching, 6(12). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p27
Mak, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System, 39(2), 202-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.002
Mills, N. (2004). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to motivation, achievement, and proficiency. PhD thesis, Emory University.
Mills, N., Pajares, F. & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2). 276-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x
Mills, N., Pajares, F. & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x
Naseri, M. & Zaferanieh, E. (2012). The relationship between reading self-efficacy beliefs, reading strategy use and reading comprehension level of Iranian EFL learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 64-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p64
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Pajares, F. (2000). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 10, (pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/effchapter.html
Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. [previously published at Emory University]. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research & applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rahemi, J. (2007). Self-efficacy in English and Iranian senior high school students majoring humanities. Novitas-ROYAL, 1(2), 98-111. http://www.novitasroyal.org/Rahemi.pdf
Rahimi, A. & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners' self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 14-28. http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_3_1/rahimi_abedini.pdf
Rahimpour, M. & Nariman-Jahan, R. (2010). The influence of self-efficacy and proficiency on EFL learners' writing. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(11), 19-32. http://itdl.org/Journal/Nov_10/article02.htm
Rashidi, N. & Moghadam, M. (2014). The effect of teachers' beliefs and sense of self-efficacy on Iranian EFL learners' satisfaction and academic achievement. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 18(2), 1-23. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume18/ej70/ej70a3/
Saeidi, M. & Ebrahimi Farshchi, E. (2012). The effect of teaching communication strategies on Iranian EFL learners' speaking self-efficacy in content-based courses. Applied Linguistics Journal, 9(2), 220-238. http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/1009720120109.pdf
Schaal, S. (2010). Enriching traditional biology lectures digital concept maps and their influence on cognition and motivation. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(1), 42-54. http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/162/pdf_9
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers. Oxford: Macmillan.
Shang, H. F. (2011). Exploring the relationship between EFL proficiency level and reading strategy use. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, 18-27. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._3;_March_2011/4.pdf
Vaezi, S. & Fallah, N. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy and stress among Iranian EFL teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1168-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1168-1174
Waldrip, B. & Fisher, D. (2003). Identifying exemplary science teachers through their classroom interactions with students. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024991019271
Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bong, M. & Ahan, H. C. (2013). Korean college students' self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. The Asian EFL journal, 15(3), 81-112. http://asian-efl-journal.com/6961/quarterly-journal/2013/09/korean-college-students-self-regulated-learning-strategies-and-self-efficacy-beliefs-in-learning-english-as-a-foreign-language/
Wang, J., Spencer, K. & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37(1), 46-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.05.001
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4), 515-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00048-2
Yilmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.084
Zarei, A. A. & Gilanian, M. (2015). Self-efficacy as a function of language learning strategy use. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9(3), 223-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/18735
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of SE beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663
VU = very unsatisfactory; U = unsatisfactory; N = neutral; S = satisfactory; VS = very satisfactory
|How satisfactory do you find:||VU||U||N||S||VS|
|1||The spoken vocabulary you learn in your speaking class|
|2||The effect of your speaking class on the improvement of your pronunciation|
|3||The effect of your speaking class on your accuracy in speaking|
|4||The effect of your speaking class on the improvement of your fluency in speaking|
|5||The impact of your speaking class on your ability to exchange ideas in English|
|6||The contribution of your speaking class to your knowledge of idiomatic expressions, collocations, and proverbs|
|7||The effect of the atmosphere of your speaking class on you|
|8||The level of your self-confidence to speak English in the classroom|
|9||Your ability to make use of the stuff you have learnt in the classroom for real life communication|
|10||The cooperation between you and your classmates|
|11||Your classmates'reactions to your mistakes|
|12||Your speaking class in providing the opportunity for you to speak in English with your classmates and instructors|
|13||The effect of your speaking class on your ability to communicate with native speakers|
|14||The proficiency level of your classmates|
|15||The level of the course book introduced to you|
|16||The sufficiency and efficiency of speaking exercises in the course book|
|17||Your instructor's motivation for teaching|
|18||The help of your instructor when you face speaking skills problems in the classroom|
|19||The way your instructor evaluates your speaking skills|
|20||Your access to your instructor after class time|
|21||The speaking activities you are asked to do by your instructor in the classroom|
|22||The way your instructor makes use of audio-visual faculties in the classroom|
|23||Your instructor's explanation and clarification of the target culture|
|24||The balance your instructor considers in using English and Persian|
|25||Your instructor's feedback on your mistakes|
|26||The speaking homework your instructor asks you to do at home|
|27||Supplementary materials such as story books, language CDs, introduced to you by your instructor|
|28||The amount of time your instructor allocates to speaking skills activities during a session|
|29||Your speaking instructor's methods of teaching|
|30||Your speaking instructor's relationship with you|
|31||Your speaking instructor's accent|
|32||The encouragement you get from your instructor to speak|
|33||The topic your instructor presents in the classroom for|
|34||The contribution of your speaking class to the improvement of your weaknesses in speaking skills|
|35||The efficiency and sufficiency of the audio-visual facilities used in your speaking class|
|36||The number of students in your classroom|
|37||The time when your speaking classes are held|
|38||The physical appearance of your speaking classroom.|
SD = strongly disagree; D = disagree; N = neutral; A = agree; SA = strongly agree
|1||I have enough ability to improve my speaking skills.|
|2||I am sure that if I practice speaking more, I will get better grades in the course.|
|3||I can speak better than my classmates.|
|4||Even if the speaking task is difficult and I don't have the required vocabulary, I can find the strategy to get the message across.|
|5||I am not stressed out when speaking English in the classroom.|
|6||I enjoy speaking with a proficient partner.|
|7||I am one of the best students in speaking courses.|
|8||I enjoy meeting tourists because I can speak with them well.|
|9||The more difficult the speaking practice is, the more enjoyable it is.|
|10||When the instructor asks a question, I raise my hand to answer it even if I'm not sure about it.|
|11||I'm confident about my ability to interact with other English speakers.|
|12||While speaking, I can deal efficiently with unexpected situations.|
|13||While speaking, I can remain calm when facing difficulties.|
|14||When I'm talking with fluent speakers, I let them know if I need help.|
|15||I'm confident I can communicate what I mean easily.|
|16||I feel confident that I can achieve a native-like accuracy in speaking.|
|17||I'm able to actively participate in my speaking classes.|
|18||I'm sure I can use English outside the classroom.|
|19||I believe I am a good English speaker.|
|20||I strongly believe that I can achieve native-like fluency in English.|
|21||I can describe my university to others in English.|
|22||I can tell a story in English.|
|23||I can ask my teachers questions in English.|
|24||I can produce sentence with idiomatic expressions.|
|25||I can introduce my teacher to someone else in English.|
|26||I can discuss subjects of my interest with my classmates.|
|27||I can introduce myself in English.|
|28||I can answer my teachers' questions in English.|
|Authors: Ahmad Asakereh is an MA graduate in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) from Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. His research interests include speaking skills and materials evaluation.|
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Web: http://basu.ac.ir/?lang=en-US
Maliheh Dehghannezhad is a holder of an MA degree in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) from Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. Her research interests include psycholinguistics and second language skills and strategies.
Email: email@example.com Web: http://basu.ac.ir/?lang=en-US
Please cite as: Asakereh, A. & Dehghannezhad, M. (2015). Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: Relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 345-363. http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/asakereh.html