![]() |
IIER Editorial 34(4): (i) "... Could not be evaluated ..."; (ii) Editorial miscellanea
Roger Atkinson and Clare McBeath
IIER Co-Editors, Australia
We regret that due to the emergence of a backlog in IIER's review process, we have temporarily suspended our providing of the formative advice from IIER editorial staff that usually accompanies IIER's "initial assessment" advice. The backlog is due to continuing high rates of submission (http://www.iier.org.au/iier34/editorial34-2.html) [1] ... During Jan-Nov 2024, IIER has averaged 66.4 submissions per month, including 76 for October and 75 for November. ...Currently, advice under the heading "IIER editorial staff comments" is very limited, as illustrated in this 'template':
In time, we will resume the usual provision of formative advice under the heading "IIER editorial staff comments". We are very aware of the value of advice on reasons for declining a submission, and suggestions on how to attain an acceptable standard for publication in an international journal. However, resumption may take some months, owing to the current high rate of submission of articles and the problem of long queues waiting for responses.
IIER editorial staff commentsHowever, as may be expected, some 'pushback' does occur, as illustrated by this recent correspondence, which was the origin for the scene-setting part of the title for this section, "... Could not be evaluated due to workload" (some paraphrasing of XX's plea has been made, to ensure higher reliability of anonymisation):
Under IIER's current circumstances of high submission rates and acceptance rates falling to near 10%, we are becoming more limited in the extent to which we can cater for topics ... [insert a few phrases about the topics, methods, context, etc., presented in the submission for which the Duty Editor acknowledgements [1] is providing "initial assessment" advice].
Dear Editor,There is much to 'unpick' about "... Could not be evaluated due to workload". Compromises are necessary in the conduct of journal activities. One of the most important compromises is that opting for brevity in IIER's "initial assessment" advice enables a more rapid response. Nearly always our "initial assessment" advice is issued within a shorter period than the "2-4 weeks" we have specified for some years [2]. Rapid feedback is preferred by authors, even if very brief and very often negative ("... we regret to advise that we decline to accept it for IIER publication").
You said that our article could not be evaluated due to workload. However, I must get an article in a Scopus-indexed journal. Is there any way ours can be evaluated? I would be very glad if you could help me in this regard.
Hello XX,
We do regret that at present IIER is very tightly constrained, being unable to command more work from the current team, experiencing sustained high rates of submission, a slowdown in our search for new associate editors, capacity capped at about 80 articles accepted per year, and a severe and persistent lack of international journals that emulate IIER's important features.
One editorial project that we must try to reserve some time-for-progressing is the compilation of a list of journals that emulate, or nearly emulate, IIER's important features that attract authors. In brief, in no particular order, these include perceived high status ("Scopus-indexed" [3]), world language (English), open access (DOAJ listed), no APCs (no article processing charges), not subjected to a publisher copyright (using Creative Commons licence "BY ND"), publishing a wide range of topics (being a 'generalist' research journal), providing a high standard, free copy editing service for accepted articles that extends into substantive editing, and a willingness to engage cooperatively and respectfully with non-Western authors, EFL/ESL authors, and country contexts that are under-represented in the international educational research literature.
I'm sorry that at present we cannot be more helpful.
Roger
For IIER
It may seem ironic or even contradictory in the context of a musing about editorial workloads, to propose more work, namely "... compilation of a list of journals that emulate, or nearly emulate, IIER's important features...". The excuse is that some time invested now may save a larger amount of editorial time in the future. Occasionally we receive questions from disappointed authors ("Can you suggest another journal?"), and we know that we can improve our "initial assessment" advice if we can offer at least a few specific suggestions. Also, our general reading about trends in academic publishing as an industry, and large amounts of time spent on the copy editing of references lists does give insights into journals that are comparable to IIER.
The paragraph beginning "One editorial project ..." was not composed for XX. It was mainly a draft for an editorial item, subsequently expanded in Miscellanea 3 below, as we seek to offer more precisely and persuasively a voice, on behalf of a growing number of frustrated prospective authors, concerning deficiencies in the world's academic journal publishing industry, in the research field of education. How well (or how poorly) is capacity expanding? How well (or how poorly) are needs being defined and served? Is there a crisis for some particular kinds of capacity and needs?
IIER's current perspective features "high submission rates and acceptance rates falling to near 10%", and "temporarily suspend[ing] our providing of the formative advice ...". There seems sufficient evidence that we can invoke the melodramatic word crisis in the subtitle for this section, A crisis in academic journal publishing capacity? However, that has to be carefully qualified, to be focused on the particular kinds of capacity and needs as we perceive from the successful and unsuccessful submissions to IIER. This is how we arrived at Miscellanea 3: One editorial project... that is discussed below. We need to know more about other educational research journals similar to IIER. Is there really "a severe and persistent lack of international journals that emulate IIER's important features"?
1a. | Dear Sir/Madam, I am willing to get my paper published in your journal. May I ask whether or not you take systematic review papers in PRISMA-SCR form? I am looking forward to hearing from you. Hello XXX, Please explore the representation of systematic reviews in IIER using the following Google Scholar search string (copy and paste into web reader address box): https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?as_q=&as_epq=systematic+review&as_oq=& as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=%22issues+in+educational+ research%22&as_ylo=2020&as_yhi=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 About 116 results since 2020 Best wishes, Dr Roger Atkinson Duty Co-editor for acknowledging submissions, December 2024 |
1b. |
... I would like to know if there is an express review form for the magazine. If so,
could you tell me the associated cost? [Q received after an initial response had been sent to XXY]
IIER does not have any provision for 'express reviews'. The main reason is that in the interests of fairness and transparency, we endeavour to maintain an orderly queue based on date of receipt. Resorting to the vernacular and idiomatic Australian English, 'no queue jumping'. {RA's terse response to XXY] |
1c. |
Dear Editor, I have sent my manuscript to IIER Journal and received a response today. I am not clear with the reason for rejecting my manuscript. Is it due to exceeding page limits or that you did not want the topic of reflecting on [topic redacted]? Does it mean I have to reduce the pages and resubmit or I should stop the process at this point? Should I expect comments on my manuscript or that is all? I would be grateful if you could let me know these queries. Thank you. Hello XYY, Please read http://www.iier.org.au/iier34/editorial34-2.html for insight into why we are unable to give reasons for rejecting an article. We expect to receive about 750 articles during 2024. We expect that we can accept only about 84 of these. Very regrettably, owing to staffing constraints, feedback upon articles that we have no capacity to accept is severely limited, though sometimes a few words are given about one or two matters that may be noted. In a small number of cases, we may encourage a resubmission for a new review. In your case we did not invite a resubmission, but we did make a brief indication of one step that could be undertaken to improve prospects for aceeptance by another journal. Best wishes, Roger For IIER |
Miscellanea 3: One editorial project ... what sources could be used?
This idea, hastily sketched out in editorial email cited above, obtained a limited initial trial through our compilation of Table 1 as background preparation for a recent local webinar [8], though the Table was not presented. It explored "What sources could be used?"
AER | AJTE | IIER | |
Full name | Australian Educational Researcher | Australian Journal of Teacher Education | Issues in Educational Research |
Home page | https://link.springer.com/journal/13384 | https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte | http://www.iier.org.au/ |
Main or sole sponsor | Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) | Edith Cowan University (ECU) | Western Australian Institute for Educational Research (WAIER) |
Publisher | Springer (commercial) | University | Small scale professional societies |
Copyright | Option non-OA - transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher. Option OA - CC BY | Assign to ECU, certain rights granted back to author. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/publication_rights.pdf | Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ |
Scopus | CiteScore 2023 4.6. Rank #306/1543 Percentile 80th. https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/29540 | CiteScore 2023 1.8. Rank #844/1543, Percentile 45th. https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/17600155115 | CiteScore 2023 2.8. Rank #594/1543, Percentile 61st. https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/12734 |
Scimago | Q1, SJR 2023 0.97 https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=29540&tip=sid&clean=0 | Q2, SJR 2023 0.39 https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=17600155115&tip=sid&clean=0 | Q2, SJR 2023 0.53 https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=12734&tip=sid&clean=0 |
Digital object identifier) | https://doi.org/10.1007/13384.2210-5328 | https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte | DOI not sought, see http://www.iier.org.au/iier27/editorial27-2.html |
Found. yr (curr vol) | Presumably 1974 (v. 51) | 1976 (current vol. is presumably vol. 49) | 1991 (v. 34) |
Artics. in 2023 [2013] | Vol. 50, 91 articles, 1163 pages [Vol. 40, 42 articles, 657 pages] | Vol. 48, 48 articles, 927 pages [Vol. 38, 108 articles] | Vol. 33, 83 articles, 1622 pages [Vol. 23, 29 articles, 435 pages] |
Range | 'Generalist'; international | Teacher educ.; international | 'Generalist'; international |
Acceptance rate | No public information found. | "Intending authors should be aware that the Journal has a rejection rate in excess of 50%" | Tabulated data for 2015-23 at http://www.iier.org.au/iier34/editorial34-2.html |
Open access | OA purchase US$2990 | Fully open access, no charges | Fully open access, no charges |
Charges | No APC for non-OA | No article processing charge | No article processing charge |
Please cite as: Atkinson, R. & McBeath, C. (2024). IIER Editorial 34(4): (i) "... Could not be evaluated ..."; (ii) Editorial miscellanea. Issues in Educational Research, 34(4), ii-vii. http://www.iier.org.au/iier34/editorial34-4.pdf |