Conversations on engaged pedagogies, independent thinking skills and active citizenship
Leeds Metropolitan University, UK
This paper will consider the relationship between engaged pedagogies and the development of what is referred to as independent skills, as well as active citizenship. The significance for their development in the context of the Irish teaching and learning context will be sketched, particularly at first and second level. In particular, the author will make reference to the Open Spaces for Dialogue and Enquiry Methodology (OSDE) which was developed at the Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (CSSGJ) at the University of Nottingham. The author's experience of engaging with this particular approach, especially as it pertains to the development of independent thinking skills and active citizenship will be discussed. It will involve a case study, as well as findings from a questionnaire that was distributed to the Open Spaces for Dialogue and Inquiry Network.
As this paper has a particular focus on the teaching and learning context in the Republic of Ireland, it might also be reasonable to inquire as to why the capacity for independent thinking has relevance there at this time. The Taskforce on Active Citizenship Report (2007, p.21) affirmed its relevance however when it stated that:
Schools and colleges are places where people learn about behaviour, dialogue, decision-making as well as a range of skills, knowledge and attributes that enable people to act as thinking, critical, responsible and caring citizens in a democratic society.Despite this recognition however it is important to acknowledge that the Irish schooling system does not always provide fertile ground for the propagation of independent thinking skills. This is partly due to the fact that the said system is beholden to an over-arching economic agenda. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Report 2004 on Higher Education in Ireland clearly associates the primary purpose of higher education with the prioritising of national prosperity. Accordingly, Collins (2005) contends that the wider concepts of higher education as a critical presence in society merit hardly a mention in this report.
There are some promising developments on the horizon for the Irish schooling system however that have the potential to embed the skills for independent thinking for future generations of learners. The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) in Ireland for example is conscious of the impact of globalisation and acknowledges that the skills "of critical discernment and information handling become increasingly important" (NCCA) in such a globalised context. It is no surprise then that in its re-vamp of the senior cycle, the NCCA has given a central place for the development of a learner's critical and creative thinking capacities.
A semi-structured questionnaire was designed and forwarded to each of the participants in the module (see Appendix 1) to invite them to comment on particular aspects of the OSDE approach that underpinned it. On the question as to whether the module recognised and validated the knowledge that each of the learners brought to the learning context, the following participant commented that:
We certainly recognised that we're all coming from different experiences and backgrounds within the one education system but that this added to the group - listening to and hearing other angles widened our perspective and therefore our understanding of our context and the influencing factors that resulted in how we experienced and viewed the education system (Student 1).
The same learner also acknowledges the partiality and incompleteness of knowledge, especially in her recognition that "some of the theories were acceptable in theory but in practice there were too many variables and so you could say that the theories were incomplete and partial". Equally, she perceives that:
Our own knowledge was certainly partial also in the sense that we only experienced certain parts of the education system. Our own attitudes and experiences coloured our views on the theories we discussed (Student 1) .And, on the question of whether all knowledge can be questioned, she responds that knowledge when discussed is subjective in the sense that we all understand it in context of our experience, attitudes and what we want the knowledge to mean. She goes on to contend that "if we didn't have the freedom to question knowledge we would have to question what freedom we actually had at all".
The module's intended learning outcomes in respect of the underlying OSDE principles mentioned above were also succinctly captured in the following participant's comments:
The module opened up the senses to view education from a positive critical manner and not a blear eyed 'educationalist' ... It helped to develop a lighthouse effect on all aspects of education and its possible implications whether good or bad (Student 2).It also occurred to me however that practitioners of the Open Spaces for Dialogue and Enquiry approach might also have a valuable perspective to offer, particularly in relation to its potential for the development of independent thinking skills. Accordingly, a questionnaire was developed and distributed to the OSDE Network (see Appendix 2). On the question of whether engagement with OSDE helps learners to develop their critical thinking skills, one of the respondents commented that:
Yes, but it only works with certain students who are already engaged in the learning process and open to new perspectives. Decidedly, a smaller group would yield better results, as the teacher would be able to address individual issues more closely (Practitioner 2).In a similar vein, another practitioner suggested that:
The strengths of the methodology, from my point of view, were its transparency and inclusiveness, flexibility, adaptability (across disciplines, age groups, cultures, social groups, etc.) and its contribution towards the development or enhancement of critical literacy skills (Practitioner 3).
It is important that we do not let our discourse emphasise the economic role of higher education at the expense of the critically important social contribution that higher education makes to our society (HEA, 2006).Such a sense of the social dimension in education is also integral to the Open Spaces for Dialogue and Inquiry Approach. Its own training manual acknowledges that 'Learning to live together in a 'global', interdependent, diverse and unequal society involves the development of skills that can support learners to negotiate and cope with change, complexity, uncertainty and insecurity in different contexts' (Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice, n.d.) It is also affirmed by the following OSDE practitioners' acknowledgement that the approach fosters
a sense of agency, a feeling that they can promote changes in society, and mostly it creates in them the responsibility for implementing this change. They feel that they can change society because they can change themselves - and from here to participating actively in society there is only a very short distance (Practitioner 1).The pivotal contribution that education can make in the civic capacity building area is succinctly captured in the following statement from Garret Fitzgerald, Chancellor of the National University of Ireland, in his keynote address to Community Knowledge Initiative at the National University of Ireland Galway, where he contends that:
Unless firm ethical foundations can be laid in our schools for what I would describe as a new 'civic republicanism' - the prospect of improving, or even maintaining, the quality of Irish society as we move further into the 21st century seems pretty grim. We could eventually find that we had created an ethical waste-land (Fitzgerald, 2006).This is very much in sync with Greene's articulation on education's capacity for active citizenship as "the intentional bringing into being of norm-governed situations, situations in which students discover what it is to experience a sense of obligation and responsibility"(1995, p. 66).
Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
Barnett, R. (1999). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Collins, T. (2005). The trouble with boys: Why schools can't solve everything. Irish Times, November 15.
Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice (n.d.) Introductory booklet: Open spaces for dialogue and enquiry methodology. [Verified 4 Feb 2010] http://www.osdemethodology.org.uk/keydocs/osdebooklet.pdf
Department for Education and Skills (2007). Curriculum review: Diversity and citizenship. England.
Fitzgerald, G. (2006). Civic republicanism and public morality. Address at Community Knowledge Initiative Keynote Seminar. National University of Galway, November 14.
Freire, P. (1969, 1997). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (2006). Strategic plan 2006-2008. Dublin: Ireland.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (2007). Senior cycle: Moving forward. Dublin: Ireland.
Sartre, J. P. (1956, 1994). Being and nothingness. New York: Gramercy Books.
Szymborska, W. (1996). Nobel lecture: The New Republic. Quoted in M. Greene (1998) Towards beginnings, in W. F. Pinar (Ed.), The passionate mind of Maxine Greene: I am not yet. London: Falmer Press.
Taskforce on Active Citizenship (2006). Department of the Taoiseach, Dublin.
White, J. (2007). League tables damaging to society's future. Irish Independent, 19 November.
I am preparing a presentation for delivery at the Development Futures Conference 2007 entitled 'Open Spaces for Dialogue and Enquiry: Toward Enhanced Democratic Practices'.
OSDE is a methodology for the introduction of global issues and perspectives in educational contexts, such as teacher, adult, higher and secondary education. It also offers a methodology for structuring safe spaces for dialogue and enquiry where participants feel comfortable to express themselves and ask questions. The presentation will offer the view that it is very difficult for learners to actively engage with informed debates and discussions around rights and participatory democracy on the global scale, if they are nor fully informed about such issues in the local scene initially.
I am presenting the Theory & Practice module that was delivered at Mary I in the Fall of 2006 as an instance where the intended learning outcomes suited the OSDE approach, especially in its attempt to provide participants with opportunities to build on their professional experience and to bring a critical insight to their work.
Some of the principles underlying the OSDE approach include:
I appreciate that there is a bit of a time-lag between now and when the module was delivered. Certainly, your anonymous course review feedback comments do provide an insight but if you would like to share any additional thoughts or comments they would be very welcome. And, of course, your confidentiality will be respected.
I am currently preparing a paper presentation entitled 'Open Spaces for Dialogue and Enquiry: Toward Enhanced Democratic Practices'.
The presentation will provide evidence of experiences with OSDE from the international community of practitioners. I would greatly appreciate any thoughts or comments that you may be able to provide about the suitability of OSDE as a methodological approach, especially from the learner's perspective.
|Author: Dr Timothy Murphy is a Senior Lecturer in Education Studies at Leeds Metropolitan University. Previously, he worked as a Researcher at the Centre for Excellence in Learning &Teaching (CELT) at NUI Galway. He holds a Doctorate in Education from Teachers' College (Columbia University) in New York. He has strong interests and publications in civic education, as well as academic staff development. He recently Co-Chaired the Second International Conference on Service-learning in Teacher Education: Conversations That Matter.
Please cite as: Murphy, T. (2010). Conversations on engaged pedagogies, independent thinking skills and active citizenship. In A. Power (Ed.), Special Edition on service learning. Issues In Educational Research, 20(1), 39-46. http://www.iier.org.au/iier20/murphy.html